enter the fray: our reader discussion forum
Search in:
Advanced
View:FlatThreaded
Page 1 of 7 (99 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
by Rawksyy
+5/-3 Reply
Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban

June 06, 2007 6:00 PM ABC News

NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran's proxy war against the United States and Great Britain.

"It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that's doing it," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence "of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban."

But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran's involvement.

"This is part of a considered policy," says the analysis, "rather than the result of low-level corruption and weapons smuggling."

Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community.

"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."

The coalition analysis says munitions recovered in two Iranian convoys, on April 11 and May 3, had "clear indications that they originated in Iran. Some were identical to Iranian supplied goods previously discovered in Iraq."

The April convoy was tracked from Iran into Helmand province and led a fierce firefight that destroyed one vehicle, according to the official analysis. A second vehicle was reportedly found to contain small arms ammunition, mortar rounds and more than 650 pounds of C4 demolition charges.

A second convoy of two vehicles was spotted on May 3 and led to the capture of five occupants and the seizure of RPG-7mm rockets and more than 1,000 pounds of C4, the analysis says.

Also among the munitions are components for the lethal EFPs, or explosive formed projectiles, the roadside bombs that U.S. officials say Iran has provided to Iraqi insurgents with deadly results.

"These clearly have the hallmarks of the Iranian Revolution Guards' Quds force," said Jones.

The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area."

"We believe these intercepted munitions are part of a much bigger flow of support from Iran to the Taliban," the message says.

The Taliban receives larger supplies of weapons through profits from opium dealing, officials say, but the Iranian presence could be significant.

"It means the insurgency in Afghanistan is likely to be prolonged," said Jones. "It would be a much more potent force."

Re: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
by Jen01

I don't think anyone should be surprised.

Jen

Re: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
by Dar-al-Islam
A real shocker! Link?
and in the Saudi news
by Pace

The US sells missile to Israel, Hiya Rawks, the point here is?

Taliban is gonna lose in Afganistan, Afganistan is justing waiting to slit the next throat

So from a polarized view, there's two wrongs there, dependent upon which hemisphere you read this. Regards Pace
Link
by Rawksyy
you know the point
by Rawksyy
best regards-
Yes I do...,
by Pace

US says "do as I say, not as I do",

Not gonna work with Iran Rawks, they have a real military, and OUR

military knows it,

Regards

Pace

Re: Yes I do...,
by Rawksyy

Nice to know you don't have a problem with Iran supplying weapons to the Taliban which is is directly against our interest and the lives of our troops.

I'll leave at that. bye

Re: Yes I do...,
by RStitution
Think 67 war redux times 10. Iran has no army. Jihadists all over the world have no army. We can let criminals stone women to death, hang them from football goalposts, create fear and oppression the world over. Are we going to? That's the question every American needs to ask themselves.
Rawks, you can't debate without going adolescent
by Pace

listen to me, we do it, they do it, it's called d'etat, can you understand this?

We supply Israel, they supply Afganistan, Syria supplies Lebanon, Libya? Libya sends money, Dubai sends money, Saudi Arabia sends money, Britian sends money, Britian sends supplies.

Look at the whole picture, without doing so lends an air of incompleteness to your argument.

Regards

Pace

go adolescent?
by Rawksyy
I fail to see where I did such a thing- Iran selling weapons to our enemy is not acceptable. It might be to you but it is not to me, not while we have boots on the ground there. Sorry.
I think therefore I debate
by Pace

According to the generals who teach at the Army War Colleges, and

I've attended these lectures, approximately 58% of the men between

the ages of 28 to 34 are unemployed right now in Pakistan,

Pakistan has a nationalized military but no nationized education system

According to our own military, Pakistan is the veritable Spartan

soil where the dragon's teeth of terrorism can be sowed, with

an everlasting supply of disenfranchised young men to volunteer

You want to end this? stop enabling the Saudi government, go

cold this winter, walk, stop your consumption, send a message to

the theocracy and monarchies in the Middle East:

Shut up, feed and employ your people, or we'll starve you to death.

Regards

Pace

Rawks
by sl_kadet

it is not really a surprise about Pakistan and Iran and Saudis( possible?-yes) helping Taliban.

the question, what are we going to do about this?

In the world affairs there were always the countries or groups helping the different sides at war for their own political purposes. That is as old as the the human race.

I guess, we should defeat Taliban completely, that the other guys will have nobody to help?

Or you suggesting we start the war with Pakistan and Iran as well ?

Re: Rawks, you can't debate without going adolescent
by MrMike

I think the reality is Pace that you feel the acute need to passionately qualify that Iran somehow is justified to send munitions to kill our troops.

Or... are you one of those that feels Iran can do no wrong as long as Israel exists?

Then petition your government
by Pace

to enable the Middle East Peace process, and stop selling arms to

Israel, then, we have the high ground, but only then,.

Regards

Pace

Page 1 of 7 (99 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML