User: TexasPete
Recent Posts

• Re: Sgt. Carter used to get under Gomer Pyle's skin, too

  Posted to War Stories by TexasPete on October 23, 2009     Views: 34 Replies: 1
  Topic: Sgt. Carter used to get under Gomer Pyle's skin, too     
  Last response by gmat on November 28, 2009

• Re: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness

  Posted to War Stories by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 64 Replies: 3
  Topic: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness     
  Last response by plsgt-1 on November 18, 2009

• Re: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness

  Posted to War Stories by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 39 Replies: 2
  Topic: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness     
  Last response by plsgt-1 on November 18, 2009

• Re: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness

  Posted to War Stories by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 50 Replies: 1
  Topic: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness     
  Last response by plsgt-1 on November 18, 2009

• Re: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness

  Posted to War Stories by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 45 Replies: 1
  Topic: McCrystal trying to save US from Dem weakness     
  Last response by plsgt-1 on November 18, 2009

• Ann Coulter's first book was correct...

  Posted to Kausfiles by TexasPete on October 21, 2009     Views: 36 Replies: 2
  Topic: Fox wouldn't exist if other networks were actually balanced     Rating: +4
  Last response by okakura on October 29, 2009

• Re: Ann Coulter's first book was correct...

  Posted to Kausfiles by TexasPete on October 23, 2009     Views: 26 Replies: 0
  Topic: Fox wouldn't exist if other networks were actually balanced     Rating: +4
  Last response by okakura on October 29, 2009

• Re: Ann Coulter's first book was correct...

  Posted to Kausfiles by TexasPete on October 28, 2009     Views: 33 Replies: 1
  Topic: Fox wouldn't exist if other networks were actually balanced     Rating: +4
  Last response by okakura on October 29, 2009

• Re: We might be left with fewer than 50 people in the Senate!

  Posted to Prescriptions by TexasPete on October 28, 2009     Views: 30 Replies: 0
  Topic: Expel Lieberman from the Senate     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by TexasPete on October 28, 2009

• Re: The Emperor's new clothes

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 68 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: passing a law

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 45 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: Crosses inherently have

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: Meaningless word

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 53 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: So your arguement is

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 57 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: And the sky isn't blue

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 25 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: And the sky isn't blue

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: When used in cultural sybological context

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: Its a religious symbol

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 21, 2009     Views: 23 Replies: 2
  Topic: The Emperor's new clothes     
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 23, 2009

• Re: How much will it shave off future National debt?

  Posted to Prescriptions by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 57 Replies: 1
  Topic: How much will it shave off future National debt?     
  Last response by Aconservativeliberal on October 22, 2009

• Re: Selling Crap!

  Posted to Prescriptions by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 64 Replies: 1
  Topic: How much will it shave off future National debt?     
  Last response by Aconservativeliberal on October 22, 2009

• Re: Bottom line:

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 59 Replies: 1
  Topic: Bottom line:     Rating: +1
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are muddling issues

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 33 Replies: 1
  Topic: Bottom line:     Rating: +1
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 18, 2009

• Re: He might have

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 39 Replies: 1
  Topic: Bottom line:     Rating: +1
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 18, 2009

• Re: So did GWB.

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 40 Replies: 1
  Topic: Bottom line:     Rating: +1
  Last response by Nike Ajax on October 18, 2009

• Re: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 66 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 42 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 48 Replies: 2
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 34 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 58 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 2
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 54 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: I don't understand

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 47 Replies: 0
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: You are trying to get a rise out of everyone, eh?

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 62 Replies: 1
  Topic: What if the symbol was the Star and the Cresent?     
  Last response by Liberal Patriot on October 18, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 8, 2009     Views: 91 Replies: 3
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 9, 2009     Views: 62 Replies: 2
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 9, 2009     Views: 61 Replies: 0
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 11, 2009     Views: 40 Replies: 0
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 22, 2009     Views: 51 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 22, 2009     Views: 38 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 23, 2009     Views: 60 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 29, 2009     Views: 60 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 29, 2009     Views: 64 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 29, 2009     Views: 37 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on October 1, 2009     Views: 31 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on October 2, 2009     Views: 47 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on October 3, 2009     Views: 36 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on October 4, 2009     Views: 30 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: he gulity of something

  Posted to Jurisprudence by TexasPete on October 4, 2009     Views: 53 Replies: 1
  Topic: he gulity of something     
  Last response by rem1954 on October 15, 2009

• Re: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 53 Replies: 2
  Topic: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off     
  Last response by TexasPete on October 13, 2009

• Re: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 34 Replies: 1
  Topic: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off     
  Last response by TexasPete on October 13, 2009

• Re: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 13, 2009     Views: 35 Replies: 0
  Topic: So if the crazies on both sides get sick and die off     
  Last response by TexasPete on October 13, 2009

• Re: When did the Reaganauts stop blaming Carter?

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 12, 2009     Views: 45 Replies: 1
  Topic: When did the Reaganauts stop blaming Carter?     
  Last response by oxboggle on October 12, 2009

• Re: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 70 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: Frighteningly

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 73 Replies: 2
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: Frighteningly

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 32 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: Frighteningly

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 54 Replies: 0
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: Talk about intrusive all powerful Government

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 35 Replies: 0
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: Talk about intrusive all powerful Government

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 53 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: We've been over this.

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 49 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: And the "science" behind

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 38 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: And the "science" behind

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 59 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: And the science contradicts this

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 58 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: And the science contradicts this

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 60 Replies: 2
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: UCLA does NOT find the media "liberal"

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 41 Replies: 1
  Topic: Kiddie Porn, Snuff films, etc.....Its all illegal     
  Last response by degsme on October 12, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 47 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 42 Replies: 0
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 0
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 49 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on September 30, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 2
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 1, 2009     Views: 35 Replies: 0
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 1, 2009     Views: 67 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 1, 2009     Views: 53 Replies: 2
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 2, 2009     Views: 45 Replies: 0
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 2, 2009     Views: 52 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 5, 2009     Views: 72 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 6, 2009     Views: 56 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 7, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.

  Posted to The Green Lantern by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 72 Replies: 1
  Topic: There never was, or is, any Ozone Layer.     Rating: -1
  Last response by Philadelphia Steve on October 11, 2009

• Re: Teleprompter-in-chief: Theatre of the Absurd

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 68 Replies: 1
  Topic: Teleprompter­-in-chief: Theatre of the Absurd     Rating: +2
  Last response by DocJ on October 11, 2009

• Re: Pilots and a "Living Wage"

  Posted to Movies by TexasPete on September 25, 2009     Views: 109 Replies: 0
  Topic: Pilots and a "Living Wage"     Rating: +1
  Last response by horton02 on October 10, 2009

• Re: Pilots and a "Living Wage"

  Posted to Movies by TexasPete on September 29, 2009     Views: 60 Replies: 1
  Topic: Pilots and a "Living Wage"     Rating: +1
  Last response by horton02 on October 10, 2009

• Re: THE AUDACITY NOT TO QUESTION

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 50 Replies: 1
  Topic: THE AUDACITY TO QUESTION     
  Last response by kati on October 9, 2009

• I don't think there is a bit of difference.....

  Posted to Explainer by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 207 Replies: 3
  Topic: I don't think there is a bit of difference..­...     
  Last response by J. Ackerman on October 9, 2009

• What did Obama Do to deserve this?

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 44 Replies: 1
  Topic: JOKE     Rating: -1
  Last response by TexasPete on October 9, 2009

• Re: What did Obama Do to deserve this?

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 39 Replies: 0
  Topic: JOKE     Rating: -1
  Last response by TexasPete on October 9, 2009

• Re: What did Obama Do to deserve this?

  Posted to Politics by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 30 Replies: 0
  Topic: JOKE     Rating: -1
  Last response by TexasPete on October 9, 2009

• There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 594 Replies: 3
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 29 Replies: 2
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 46 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 29 Replies: 3
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 31 Replies: 3
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 47 Replies: 2
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 45 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 32 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 42 Replies: 0
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 60 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 32 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: There should be 2 questions.....

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 8, 2009     Views: 47 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009

• Re: Well, duhhhhhhh

  Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by TexasPete on October 9, 2009     Views: 39 Replies: 1
  Topic: There should be 2 questions...­..     Rating: +1/-1
  Last response by yearbooker on October 9, 2009